Emergency Preparedness FMJ Article
What Have You Done For Me Lately?
Two years after 9/11
Bill Conley
It has been two years after one of the most tragic events to
occur on American soil. On Sept. 11, 2001, the surreal became
the real. The shock and denial that we all felt as wave after
wave of reports washed over us and through us still resonates
in our culture and our lives.
The major impact though, the initial feelings of helplessness
and frustration, has waned over time. The fresh, raw grief and
outrage this atrocity fomented has turned instead to the more
passive feelings of sorrow and remembrances. This is human nature.
This is how we cope. Anything less than an active approach, though,
will allow history to repeat itself.
As facility professionals, we are trained to handle crisis.
It is our role to provide for the safety, health and well-being
of the people and property in our charge. We are the first line
of defense against any disaster that may befall us. This not only
entails the physical security of our surroundings, but also the
emotional needs of our constituents and it applies especially
to the prospect of future threats.
Ground Zero
The immediate reaction to the events of 9/11 was the concept of
“more.” More security guards were hired, more surveillance
equipment was added, more locks and bars were installed. The first
inclination facilities managers and corporations had was to create
more impregnable buildings and workplaces, to expend extra efforts
into making our sites unassailable.
According to an IFMA survey in February 2002, 90 percent of the
Facility Managers responding reassessed their security systems
after the attack on the World Trade Center. Correspondingly, 12
percent upgraded their video equipment and 23 percent added additional
private security officers. Interior and exterior building patrols
were increased. Armed guards were hired. Nine percent of the respondents
hired security consultants. The trend to improve our safety through
augmentation was our first response.
As time went by, though, emotions gave way to pragmatism, studies
were developed on the causes and effects of terrorism, and our
approach to the problem shifted. Businesses have moved their focus
to emergency response and business continuity efforts. This trend
is evident from billion dollar companies in the mid-west to multi-tenant
buildings on the west coast.
Knowing the enemy
The real first step in anticipating a terrorist attack is to try
and understand the psychology behind these actions. The question
is not “will there be another attack?”, but “when
will there be another attack?” We must recognize the eventuality
of further incidents. We have learned that these attacks can happen
anywhere, at any time. It doesn’t matter if all a company
does is manufacture dog scoop bags. Everyone is vulnerable.
Perpetrators of these acts do not believe in the sanctity of
life, either their own or others. It is almost impossible to protect
ourselves against a foe who is willing to end their own life to
cause us pain.
They do not look for a high-kill ratio. Thus, they use conventional
bombs rather than high-end explosives. Their intent is more to
disrupt our lives, our economy or our business and weaken our
morale more than to create a huge body count. Although their level
of planning may be complex, for the most part the attacks are
simplistic; ram & destroy. This has been their modus operandi
in nearly every major terrorist attack over the past decade, from
the USS Cole, to the marine barracks in Lebanon, to the two attacks
on the World Trade Center.
Our job, assuming damage is done, is to minimize the destruction
and get back to business as quickly and as seamlessly as possible.
First steps
In order for facility management to rise up to this challenge
that in actuality faces us every day, there are things that we
can do, that we must do. It involves creating and subscribing
to a pact, whether it be tacit or expressed, between ourselves
and those who rely on us. This pact revolves around four major
activities: preparation, awareness, communication and training.
Its strength lies in continuity and adherence. The road to ruin
is paved with good intentions; the path to success relies on perseverance.
In the last two years, FMs worldwide have come to understand
this better. It has become crystal clear that great plans can’t
be created and then left on the shelf. Practice, repetition and
visibility of the plan must become an integral part of life in
the workplace.
As a case in point, in 1993, a bomb went off in the underground
parking lot of the World Trade Center. Six people were killed.
Based on that attack, all companies in the complex embarked on
the development and implementation of evacuation procedures. Training
of responsible personnel was ongoing and periodic drills were
conducted regularly. When the planes struck the towers on Sept.
11, approximately 2,800 people died. Yet more than 25,000 people
were evacuated safely. The saving of so many lives was due only
to the fact that evacuation training was conducted, upgraded and
practiced in a dedicated effort for the intervening eight years.
There is empowerment through preparedness. A tangible sense
of confidence and strength is evident when people feel that they
are ready for anything. A facility manager in Kansas City expanded
her security procedures to cover the possibility of an attack.
Two years later, she says; “How do we feel now? Strong,
alert and vigilant.”
Preparation
A plan has two major phases. First, it needs to be developed.
One major company in Orange County, Calif. not only revisited
its security plans, but it almost completely revamped it. The
event convinced upper management to focus more on preparedness
and continuity planning. It caused the creation of a team to develop
a formal business continuity guidance manual. This manual was
used as a guideline that all offices and business units could
use as a tool that along with site audits would help develop individual
plans endemic to their sites.
However, a plan is only as good as the last time it was tested.
It must be rewritten and updated as time goes by. It must be utilized
regularly so that everyone is familiar with it. It should be treated
as a living document subject and subjected to change. It has to
be maintained. The maintenance of any program is where most of
the pitfalls appear. It’s very easy to have ideas, but to
work them through the years means overcoming boredom, stagnancy
and lack of interest. There is a direct correlation between the
rise of apathy and the fading of memories. As has been said many
times before, a plan must be “worked” in order for
it to be a viable, successful option.
Awareness
Awareness is key, but it must be cultivated and kept alive. To
many, this may sound like Observation 101. But in many cases,
the most simple applications of common sense are the ones we take
for granted. People sometimes forget to do the obvious thing when
hustling from point A to point B, or when engrossed in their activities.
If we harken back to our childhood when crossing the street, we
may still hear our parents’ admonishments to “Stop,
look and listen.” That precept still works today.
Everyone in the facility must learn to be continually observant
during the course of the day. This applies to safety hazards as
well as intrusive presences, but in the case of terrorism, the
need to be aware of surroundings has been heightened.
Employees must know what to look for: strangers in or around
the site, unfamiliar cars in the parking areas (especially for
extended periods of time), anything out of the ordinary. Sometimes
these just register subconsciously. There is a feeling that something
is wrong, but people don’t pay attention to it. They must
learn to take the time to make note of these anomalies.
Facility managers are usually the most attuned to these types
of feelings. There is a certain resonance evident when all is
going well––a constant hum of sorts. The noise, when
something is not quite right, that points to something being a
kilter can be quite strident, an inner voice that cautions us
to “check this out.” We need to pay attention to these
early warnings.
Employees need to know where and to whom their observations
should be reported. Again, this is part of working the plan. If
we don’t have a control point, all the efforts and awareness
in the world will prove worthless.
Finally, we need the means to investigate and mitigate any such
occurrences in the workplace. Whether we have someone on site
that is qualified and trained to handle these types of situations,
or we have a good rapport with local law enforcement agencies,
knowing about a situation and being able to handle it are as different
as night and day. As much as we feel that we are the ones responsible
for the safety and well-being of our site, it may not always be
the smartest thing in the world for an FM to try and be the saviour.
Communication
Having a plan is great. Working the plan is great. However, it
is probably fairly important that you communicate the plan. Keeping
employees apprised of policy and procedures and updates will go
a long way in ensuring success.
Department heads and senior management must be a part of this
process. Not only do we need their buy-in and support, but we
must always alert them to changes that will affect them or their
employees.
Some FMs have a Web site or a place on the company’s intranet
where information is accessible. Reminder emails are sent out
on a periodic basis as well as notifications of any changes. Other
departments may have manuals or even a basic outline posted on
bulletin boards. Site maps and evacuation routes should also be
posted in well-traveled areas for visitors and guests in the facility.
The more information that can be disseminated and ingested, the
better off everyone will be.
Communication external to the facility is important also. We
must create and utilize a large sphere of influence and feedback.
Letting our neighbors know our plans and coordinating with them
will facilitate evacuations and/or damage control when necessary.
It also helps to have an established communications network within
the local business community. In the cities of Los Angeles, Calif.
and Phoenix, Ariz., for instance, there are regularly held meetings
amongst businesses, law enforcement agencies, fire and emergency
services to conduct planning and drills for the general area.
Contacts within each business have also been created to report
untoward activities or suspicious circumstances. They have created
a macro-sized “neighborhood crime watch” system. The
whole community has mobilized to increase awareness and create
an early warning system.
As an offshoot of this, maintaining a strong and open relationship
with local civil authorities is crucial to safety and security.
Having someone to turn to for assistance and guidance, as well
as enforcement and containment can be very beneficial in every
aspect of running a facility. The more they know about us and
our business, the easier it can be for them to respond to our
needs. In some towns and cities, a local fire station crew will
come out and evaluate evacuation efforts for us, actually taking
part in the drills.
Training
If execution is 90 percent of planning, then training is 90 percent
of execution. Drills and responsibilities must be performed and
repeated again and again.
Some of the procedures that facilities employ entail evacuation
drills on a regular basis. Floor wardens have been chosen. Volunteers
are best, as they will be more committed to consistency than employees
who are designated. These wardens are responsible for geographic
areas in the facility, whether it be floors of a high-rise or
areas of large, single-story facilities. They are to control the
flow of traffic out of the building, ensure that everyone in their
tactical area of responsibility is accounted for, and maintain
education and communication throughout the year for their charges.
Some companies have even gone so far as to implement a “buddy”
system. Many departments have employees who work together constantly.
With a “buddy” system, we can track all personnel,
knowing if someone is out sick, on vacation, at an off-site meeting
or just away from their work area when an evacuation is necessitated.
Another action that 9/11 prompted companies to take was to establish
a medical response team. Members of this team have the responsibility
to handle medical emergencies in the workplace. The availability
and use of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) has also become
more prevalent in some workplaces. The American Red Cross can
help with training on these machines.
This task force of managers, wardens, security and medical responders
must be continually challenged to adhere to their duties. Periodic
drills and exercises must be performed optimally on a quarterly
or semi-annual basis. Emergency communications devices, alarm
systems, paging and public address systems must be tested. Assembly
areas must be chosen for accessibility and safety. These areas
must be checked regularly to see if they are still usable.
Experience has taught us that dust can’t collect on our
tools, whether they be emergency plans or electronic devices,
and neither can rust collect on our consciousness. We must stay
active to be effective, and it is hoped that the events of 9/11
have shown everyone that drills and training classes might disrupt
productivity a bit, but they are better than the alternative.
Aftermath
There’s a certain feeling of self-satisfaction that facility
managers get with the realization that we’ve done a good
job. Usually, FMs don’t get the kudos that we think (we
know) that we deserve, so sometimes our only solace is the fact
that everything that can be done has been done. In fact, most
of the activities handled in facility management are performed
so that adverse occurrences do not happen. It is a rare melding
of reactive and proactive stances, using history to project the
future. Thus we implement preventive maintenance, analyze cycles
and formulate plans––strategic, tactical and operational––to
prepare for any eventuality.
As leaders in the workplace, it’s up to us to look beyond
the day to day activities of bringing in revenue and ensure that
others understand that without these efforts, without constancy
of purpose and dedication to security issues more is at stake
than mere dollars.
One CFM put it this way, “The success of any program put
in place is driven by the passion and desire of the facility manager
to maintain a safe and secure work environment.” It may
be needed to add that we must infect others with that attitude.
FMJ
About
the author: Bill Conley, CFM, CFMJ, is one of the principals of
CFM2, a facility management consulting practice in Aliso Viejo,
Calif., along with his wife, Anita Ciminesi. He is also a frequent
contributer to Facility Management Journal.
Acknowledgements:
The author would like to thank the following IFMA members for
their input and advice on this article: Don Burrus, CFM; Anita
Ciminesi; Cheryl Johnson, CFM; Donna Koontz; Phyllis Meng, CFM,
IFMA Fellow; Mark Sekula, CFM; Jim Sharer, CFM; and John Sorich,
CFM.
|